Faculty of Law Journal

Department of Law Journal

Our Journal Website
02588864333 dean.law@ru.ac.bd
  • Submission
  • Apply Now
Faculty of Law Journal
  • HOME
  • About Journal
  • Current Issues
  • Aims and Objectives
  • Instruction for Authors
  • Notice Archive
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Bangladesh’s Response to Custodial Torture: A Critical Overview

- Bangladesh’s Response to Custodial Torture: A Critical Overview -

  • HOME
  • About Journal
  • Aims and Objectives
  • Call for Papers
  • Editor Panel
  • Board of Editors
  • Current Issue▸
    • LAW JOURNAL, VOL-11
    • LAW JOURNAL, VOL-10
    • LAW JOURNAL, VOL-9
    • LAW JOURNAL, VOL-8
    • LAW JOURNAL, VOL-7
    • LAW JOURNAL, VOL-6
    • LAW JOURNAL, VOL-5
    • LAW JOURNAL, VOL-4
    • LAW JOURNAL, VOL-3
    • LAW JOURNAL, VOL-2
    • LAW JOURNAL, VOL-1
  • Instruction for Authors
  • Notice Archive
  • Contact Us

Bangladesh’s Response to Custodial Torture: A Critical Overview

Sharmin Afroj
Department of Law, Chittagong University,

Asma Bint Shafiq
Department of Law, Chittagong University,


Publish Date: September 10, 2023

DOI: #

Issue: 12

Page Number: 219-241

PDF: View PDF


Abstract

Custodial torture has become a common phenomenon in Bangladeshi society. The Law Enforcement Agencies (LEA), Bangladesh Police, Parliamentary forces such as the Rapid Action Battalion (RAB), the Border Guards Bangladesh (BGB), the Directorate General of Forces Intelligence (DGFI), and the National Security Intelligence (NSI) inflict systematic torture in the name of interrogation in their respective custodies, camps, safe-houses, and secret detention centers upon an alleged accused. This custodial torture is prevalent in the country despite the constitutional guarantee of the prohibition of torture and other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment. Bangladesh also holds an international obligation to prevent this inhuman practice as it acceded to the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT), 1984. Following the provisions of the CAT, 1984 Bangladesh has enacted the Torture and Custodial Death (Prevention) Act 2013. By analyzing different provisions of the CAT and the Act of 2013 this paper argues that Bangladesh’s response to custodial torture is inadequate. It recommends that this inadequacy can be addressed by the amendment of the Act of 2013, ensuring its proper implementation, and creating awareness amongst LEA as well as the people at large about the prevention of torture.

← Previous: Accountability for Deceptive Advertisement through Celebrities: Exploring Legal Scenario of Bangladesh
Next: Ensuring Justice towards Victims of Sexual and Domestic Violence through Judicial Activism →

About Us

This is an example page. It’s different from a blog post because it will stay in one place and will show up in your site navigation (in most themes). Most people start with an About page that introduces them to potential site visitors. It might say something like this: Hi there! I’m a bike messenger by day, aspiring actor by night, and this is my website. I live in Los Angeles, have a great dog named Jack, and I like piña coladas. (And gettin’ caught in the rain.) read more

Important Links

  • About US
  • Contact Us
  • Current Issues
  • Editorial Board
  • Submission Board
  • Journal Application
  • Bangladesh Journals
  • International Journals

Latest News

  • This is an example page. It’s different from a blog post because it will stay in one place and will show up in your site navigation September 2, 2025
  • Application for submission Article September 2, 2025
  • আবেদনের জন্য প্রয়োজনীয় কাগজ পত্র September 2, 2025

Follow us

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Refund and Returns Policy
  • Acceptable Use Policy (AUP)

All rights reserved © 2026, Faculty of Law Journal. Design & Developed by rajIT Solutions Ltd.